Anar al contingut (clic a Intro)
UdG Home UdG Home
Tancar
Menú

Estudia

General information

Academic year:
2025
Description:
The course focuses on the kinds of transformations needed for global business to move away from extraction-based models centred on customer value and the pursuit of competitiveness and economic growth. The adoption of sustainable and circular business models was a first step in that direction, but they proved insufficient to reduce inequality and environmental degradation. In response, regenerative business models such as doughnut economics and post-growth economics have been proposed as the most promising ways for global business to respect planetary limits while ensuring minimum social standards.
ECTS credits:
6
Course coordinator:
Jaume Oscar Guía Julve

Groups

Group DS

Duration:
One-semester, 2nd semester
Teaching staff:
Jaume Oscar Guía Julve
Language of the classes:
English (100%)

Group EA

Duration:
One-semester, 2nd semester
Teaching staff:
Jaume Oscar Guía Julve
Language of the classes:
English (100%)

Syllabus

1. Foundations of business models This chapter introduces students to the concept of the business model as both a practical tool and a theoretical lens. It traces the evolution of business model thinking, highlighting key components (e.g., value proposition, revenue logic, governance), and distinguishes between different business model frameworks (e.g., Business Model Canvas, Value Architecture, systems mapping). It also introduces paradigmatic assumptions behind models: from neoclassical efficiency to more-than-human and relational ontologies. Students begin developing a critical lens to see business models as socially and culturally embedded constructs, not neutral tools.

2. Rethinking sustainability This chapter critiques conventional notions of sustainability and growth-centered models of “green business.” It examines the evolution from weak to strong sustainability, integrates the concepts of planetary boundaries and social floors (as in the Doughnut model), and explores justice-based approaches such as climate justice and intergenerational equity. Students are exposed to the tensions between sustainability as market opportunity vs. sustainability as systemic transformation. This sets the stage for moving beyond sustainability toward regenerative paradigms.

3. Global North capitalist main models This chapter surveys dominant capitalist business models as practiced in the Global North, including corporate, financialized, and digital platform-based models. It explores how these models prioritize growth, shareholder value, and scalability, often externalizing social and ecological costs. The chapter also examines variations within capitalism, such as B-Corps, ESG-certified businesses, and social enterprises, that attempt to reconcile profit with purpose. Students critically assess whether these adaptations offer genuine alternatives or reinforce existing paradigms.

4. Post-growth and regenerative models This chapter introduces business models that fundamentally reject the growth imperative, including those aligned with degrowth, sufficiency, and regenerative economics. Students explore frameworks such as Doughnut Economics, care economies, community wealth-building, and commons-based peer production. These models emphasize redistribution, wellbeing, localism, and more-than-human flourishing. Tools for mapping and analyzing post-growth business models (e.g., PBMMF) are presented. The focus is on viability, ethics, and transition strategies beyond green capitalism.

5. State capitalist models Focusing on state-capitalist economies such as China, Singapore, and Gulf monarchies, this chapter examines models where the state or ruling party plays a dominant role in shaping business ecosystems. It distinguishes between sovereign wealth-driven strategies, party-affiliated enterprises, and technocratic developmentalism. The chapter also discusses “authoritarian environmentalism” and centralized green transitions. Students learn to differentiate these from both liberal capitalism and post-growth alternatives, and evaluate their sustainability claims.

6. Global South models This chapter explores the diverse landscape of business models across the Global South. It covers informal and subsistence-based enterprises, state-led industrialization, microfinance initiatives, and NGO-driven social entrepreneurship. It also examines hybrid economies shaped by colonial legacies, global markets, and local values. Special attention is given to ethical embeddedness, social reciprocity, and the role of family, kinship, and place-based trust. Students analyze how these models defy binary categories and bring unique logics of resilience and innovation.

7. Pluriversal and non-capitalist models This chapter delves into radically different ontologies of economic life found in Indigenous, animist, and kinship-based communities worldwide. It includes examples from Turkana, Quechua, Sami, and other non-market-based economies. Students learn how these models embody relational ethics, cosmological reciprocity, and more-than-human responsibility. The chapter also discusses “ontological alternatives” and the notion of the pluriverse, a world in which many worlds fit, challenging modernist assumptions of universality, linear development, and extractivism.

8. Capstone synthesis and futures In the final chapter, students engage in comparative reflection across all paradigms studied. They evaluate the limits and possibilities of each business model type in addressing social, ecological, and ontological challenges. The course culminates in student presentations of their own business model mappings or future-oriented scenarios, integrating tools and concepts learned throughout. Futures thinking and creative imagination are emphasized to envision regenerative, plural, and post-capitalist pathways in global business.

Activities

Activity type Hours with a teacher Hours without a teacher Virtual hours with a teacher Total
Problem Based Learning (PBL) 12,00 0 0 12,00
Information search and analysis 0 18,00 0 18,00
Debate 12,00 0 0 12,00
Individual preparation of assignments 0 18,00 0 18,00
Lecture / text commentary 0 18,00 0 18,00
Seminars 12,00 0 0 12,00
Theory class 12,00 0 0 12,00
Learning-based tasks and quizzes 0 18,00 0 18,00
Teamwork 0 18,00 0 18,00
Group tutorials 12,00 0 0 12,00
Total 60,00 90,00 0 150

Bibliography

  • Magretta, J. (2002). Why business models matter.?. Harvard Business Review, 80(5),,
  • Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C.?L. (2005). Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. ?Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16(1),,
  • Teece, D.?J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation.. ?Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 172-194,,
  • Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: Recent developments and future research. ?Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042,,
  • Kuhlman, T., & Farrington, J (2010). What sustainability?? . Sustainability, 2(11), 3436- 3448.,,
  • Boström, M. (2012). A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability. Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy, 8(1), 3–14. ,,
  • Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S. III, Lambin, E. F., … Foley, J. A. (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2), Article 32.,,
  • Richardson, K., Steffen, W., et al. (2023). Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Science Advances, 8(23), eabn9835,,
  • Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist.. Chelsea Green Publishing.
  • Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits.. ?The New York Times Magazine,,
  • Eccles, R.?G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performan. ?Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857,,
  • Stubbs, W. (2017). Characterising B Corps as a sustainable business model: An exploratory study of . ?Journal of Cleaner Production, 144, 299–312,,
  • Banerjee, S.?B. (2018). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly.?. ?Critical Sociology, 34(1), 51–79,,
  • Kallis, G. (2011). In defence of degrowth.?. Ecological Economics, 70(5), 873–880,,
  • Latouche, S. (2009). Farewell to Growth. . Polity Press..
  • D'Alisa, G., Demaria, F., & Kallis, G. (Eds.) (2015). Degrowth: A Vocabulary for a New Era. Routledge.
  • Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (2012). The Wealth of the Commons: A World Beyond Market and State.. Levellers Press.
  • Hickel, J. (2019). Less is more: How degrowth will save the world. . Windmill Books..
  • Bremmer, I. (2009). The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations? . Penguin..
  • Musacchio, A., & Lazzarini, S.?G. (2014). Reinventing State Capitalism: Leviathan in Business, Brazil and Beyond. . Harvard Univ. Press..
  • Wang, H. (2015). China’s State Capitalism and World Order. In Li, X. & Wang, H. (Eds.), China and the New International Order. . Palgrave Macmillan..
  • Alami, I., & Dixon, A.?D. (2020). The strange geographies of the ‘new’ state capitalism.. ?Political Geography,?82,,
  • Cross, Jamie; Street, Alice (2009). Anthropology at the bottom of the pyramid.. University of Sussex. Journal contribution. ,,
  • Liedholm, C. (2002). Small firm dynamics: Evidence from Africa and Latin America.?. Small Business Economics, 18(1–3), 227–242. ,,
  • De Soto, H. (2000). The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else.. Basic Books..
  • Bonnet, F., Vanek, J. and Chen, M. A. (2019). Women and men in the informal economy: A statistical brief. . WIEGO Statistical Brief No. 17..
  • Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. . Duke Univ. Press..
  • Gibson Graham, J.?K. (2006). A Postcapitalist Politics. . Univ. of Minnesota Press.. Catàleg
  • Gudeman, S. (2001). The Anthropology of Economy: Community, Market, and Culture. . Wiley Blackwell.. Catàleg
  • Nelson, M.?K., & Shilling, D. (Eds.). (2018). Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Learning from Indigenous Practices for Environmental Sustainability. . Cambridge Univ. Press..
  • Tsing, A.?L. (2015). The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. . Princeton Univ. Press..
  • Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more-than-human worlds. . University of Minnesota Press..
  • Derbyshire, S. F (2020). Remembering Turkana: Material Histories and Contemporary Livelihoods in North-Western Kenya. London: Routledge. .
  • Wright, E.?O. (2010). Envisioning Real Utopias. . Verso.. Catàleg
  • Slaughter, R.?A. (2004). Futures Beyond Dystopia: Creating Social Foresight. . Routledge..
  • Mulgan, G. (2020). Social Innovation: How Societies Find the Power to Change. . Policy Press..
  • Bennett, E., Biggs, R., et al. (2016). Bright spots: Seeds of a good Anthropocene.?. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, ?14(8), 441–448,,

Assessment and Grading

Assessment activities:

Description of the activity Assessment Activity % Remediable subject
Problem-based learning (PBL) 3. The third component (20%) is a collaborative group project in which each group is assigned one of the paradigms discussed in the course. The task involves mapping the internal diversity of business models within that paradigm. Students must produce a visual typology and a short analytical report that compares different model types in terms of logic, purpose, governance structure, and contextual relevance. This activity is designed not only to broaden students’ exposure to underexplored model categories, but also to deepen their analytical skills by identifying what makes models distinct yet still aligned with the same paradigm. This group task explicitly prepares students for the final capstone project.

4. The capstone project (40%) is an individual assignment that invites students to design or reimagine a business model aligned with one of the course paradigms. The submission must include a visual representation and an analytical narrative. The narrative should explain the model’s alignment with the selected paradigm, situate it in a specific cultural, economic, or geographic context, and reflect on its sustainability implications, ethical dimensions, and design rationale. Students are expected to build upon the insights gained during the typology mapping exercise to inform their design choices and justify the relevance of their model in relation to real-world conditions.
60 Yes
Formative tasks and quizzes 1. The first component is an individual quiz (15% of the final grade) that assesses students’ grasp of core concepts and sustainability principles introduced in the first two chapters.

2. The second component, also an individual quiz (25%), focuses on the classification of business models within the five paradigms explored in the course (chapters 3 to 7). It ensures students are familiar with key typologies and can recognize the differences and shared assumptions across a wide range of model categories.
40 Yes

Grading

The evaluation will measure the capacities of the student to:

1. Define and explain the concept of a sustainable business model, its key components and how it differs from traditional models.

2. Analyze the drivers and barriers to sustainability in different global markets (economic, social and environmental).

3. Apply strategic tools to critically assess existing firms’ sustainability performance.

4. Design an original, viable business model prototype that integrates value creation for all stakeholders, customers, society and the planet.

5. Evaluate the potential social and environmental impacts of alternative business model choices

6. Communicate a clear sustainability strategy and business case

7. Collaborate effectively in teams to co-create and pitch sustainable solutions in a global context.

This evaluation system supports progressive and transformative learning by combining conceptual understanding, systemic analysis, contextual reasoning, and design-based creativity. It encourages students not only to understand what kinds of business models exist across the world, but to ask deeper questions about why they exist, when they are appropriate, how they function, and how they can be transformed to contribute to sustainable and just futures.

Specific criteria for the "No show" grade:
Students who have done neither continuous evaluation nor the single session evaluation, will receive the grade 'No presentat'

Single Assessment:
Oral exam

Minimum requirements to pass:
To pass the course, a minimum grade of 5.0 is required. All assessment activities are recoverable, and no single component exceeds 60% of the final grade, in compliance with Faculty regulations. A minimum grade of 4 out of 10 is required in the capstone project in order to pass the course.

Mentorship

If students need tutorial advice, they must make an arrangement with the course instructor.

Communication and interaction with students

The communication and interaction between students and instructors will be done through the course Moodle.

Remarks

Students may use AI tools such as ChatGPT as part of their learning process, provided that such use is transparent and critically reflected upon. AI can be a useful aid for exploration, idea generation, or initial comparison of models, but it must not replace original analysis, contextual reasoning, or ethical reflection. Clear guidance on responsible use of AI will be offered in class.

Design Amendment

Amendment of activities:
Modification of activities

In the event of an unplanned campus closure (natural disaster, health emergency), all in-person sessions must be converted to equivalent online or blended formats. Lectures become live webinars or recorded videos; workshops and labs are retooled as guided virtual activities with digital collaboration tools. This swift redesign ensures continuity of learning while respecting any travel or gathering restrictions.

Amendment of the assessment:
Modification of Evaluation

If scheduled on-site exams or presentations cannot proceed (e.g. building damage, power outage), we’ll replace them with remote assessments. Timed online quizzes, take-home assignments with extended deadlines or video-recorded oral defenses will stand in, with adjusted rubrics to preserve academic rigor and fairness under the extraordinary circumstances.

Mentoring and communication:
Tutoring & Communication

Should students lose access to standard channels (campus systems offline, internet blackouts), we’ll activate emergency support: establish a lightweight SMS/WhatsApp hotline for urgent questions, hold small-group check-ins by phone or low-bandwidth video, and circulate concise bullet-point guides on alternate login methods. This layered approach maintains clear guidance and keeps everyone connected despite the disruption.

Escull quins tipus de galetes acceptes que el web de la Universitat de Girona pugui guardar en el teu navegador.

Les imprescindibles per facilitar la vostra connexió. No hi ha opció d'inhabilitar-les, atès que són les necessàries pel funcionament del lloc web.

Permeten recordar les vostres opcions (per exemple llengua o regió des de la qual accediu), per tal de proporcionar-vos serveis avançats.

Proporcionen informació estadística i permeten millorar els serveis. Utilitzem cookies de Google Analytics que podeu desactivar instal·lant-vos aquest plugin.

Per a oferir continguts publicitaris relacionats amb els interessos de l'usuari, bé directament, bé per mitjà de tercers (“adservers”). Cal activar-les si vols veure els vídeos de Youtube incrustats en el web de la Universitat de Girona.