Estudia

• Positive thinking
• Critical thinking

1. Getting prepared for a review

2. The submission process

3. Challenges in a review

4. Writting a review answer

5. AI and review process

• Tennant, Jonathan P. Ross-Hellauer, Tony (2020). The limitations to our understanding of peer review. Research integrity and peer review, 5(1), 6-6 Catàleg
• Kaltenbrunner, Wolfgang. Birch, Kean. Amuchastegui, Maria (2022-07). Editorial Work and the Peer Review Economy of STS Journals. Science, technology, & human values, 47(4), 670-697 Catàleg
• Proctor, Diana M. Dada, Nsa. Serquiña, Anna. Willett, Julia L E. Problems with Peer Review Shine a Light on Gaps in Scientific Training. mBio, e0318322-e0318322 Catàleg

Assessment activities:

The active participation and the completion of the in class exercises

Specific criteria for the "No show" grade:
Have a no show for a minimum of the 80% of sessions

Minimum requirements to pass:
To get a pass, the assistance to the seminar sessions is compulsory.

We can communicate via online systems and if needed a face to face meeting can be settled.

If you already had experience in review processes will be perfect for the sessions. Despite this, if you still have no experience the subject can be helpful to get ready for it.