1. Getting prepared for a review 2. The submission process 3. Challenges in a review 4. Writting a review answer
Tipus d’activitat Hores amb professor Hores sense professor Hores virtuals amb professor Total Anàlisi / estudi de casos 4,00 7,00 0 11,00 Sessió participativa 8,00 6,00 0 14,00 Total 12,00 13,00 0 25
Tennant, Jonathan P. Ross-Hellauer, Tony (2020). The limitations to our understanding of peer review. Research integrity and peer review, 5(1), 6-6 Catàleg Kaltenbrunner, Wolfgang. Birch, Kean. Amuchastegui, Maria (2022-07). Editorial Work and the Peer Review Economy of STS Journals. Science, technology, & human values, 47(4), 670-697 Catàleg Proctor, Diana M. Dada, Nsa. Serquiña, Anna. Willett, Julia L E. Problems with Peer Review Shine a Light on Gaps in Scientific Training. mBio, e0318322-e0318322 Catàleg
The active participation and the completion of the in class exercises Criteris específics de la nota «No Presentat»:Have a no show for a minimum of the 80% of sessions Requisits mínims per aprovar:To get a pass, the assistance to the seminar sessions is compulsory.
If you already had experience in review processes will be perfect for the sessions. Despite this, if you still have no experience the subject can be helpful to get ready for it.