CE1 Idear, promoure i aplicar instruments i tècniques de planificació i direcció del turisme CE2 Aplicar, de manera reflexiva i crítica, metodologies d'investigació transdiciplinar i multidisciplinar a la realitat turística CG4 interpretar i avaluar amb esperit crític i rigor intel·lectual els resultats obtinguts, tant derivats d'una actuació professional com del extrets d'una investigació
1. Introduction to qualitative research 2. Qualitative data collection methods and techniques 3. Qualitative data analysis
Tipus d’activitat Hores amb professor Hores sense professor Hores virtuals amb professor Total Anàlisi / estudi de casos 6,00 22,00 0 28,00 Sessió expositiva 8,00 12,00 0 20,00 Treball en equip 8,00 17,00 0 25,00 Tutories individuals 0 0 2,00 2,00 Total 22,00 51,00 2,00 75
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. . Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101 Camprubí, R., & Coromina, L. (2016). Content analysis in tourism research. Tourism Management Perspectives, 18(), Decrop, A. (1999). Triangulation in qualitative tourism research. Tourism management (1999). Triangulation in qualitative tourism research. Tourism Management, 20(1), 157-161 Creswell, John W.. (2009). Research design : (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage. Catàleg Nunkoo. R. (2018). Handbook of Research Methods for Tourism and Hospitality Management. Edward Elgar.. Richards, Lyn. (2015). Handling qualitative data : (3rd ed). Los Angeles: SAGE. Catàleg Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2011). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data.. Sage. Silverman, David. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data :. London [etc.]: Sage. Catàleg Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitativ. Nursing & health sciences, 15(3), 398-405 Walters, T. (2016) (2016). Using thematic analysis in tourism research. . Tourism Analysis, 21(1), 21(1), 107-116
Activitats d'avaluació: Descripció de l'activitat Avaluació de l'activitat % Recuperable Group project The written research project will be evaluated according to its theoretical grounding, methodological rigor, quality of analysis, relevance of the findings, and overall coherence and academic quality. 40 Sí Oral presentation The oral presentation will be assessed based on the clarity of the presentation, the scientific rigor of the research project, the quality of the argumentation, the effective use of supporting materials, adherence to the allocated time and quality of the answers. 30 No Individual assegnment Specific criteria will be provided by the lecturer in class 30 No
Group Project 40%* Oral presentation 20% Individual assignment 20% *This project allows for a resubmission. REGARDING THE USE OF AI: The teaching staff will indicate when the use of generative AI tools or other methods is appropriate. In cases where the teaching staff has doubts about the authorship of any assessment, the student may be invited to participate in an in-person or synchronous interview (which may be recorded) to verify the student's knowledge and skills and to guarantee the authorship of the assessment. If it is not possible to guarantee that the student is the author of the assessment, it will be graded negatively. Criteris específics de la nota «No Presentat»: Students who do not attend to the Evaluation Activity or do not present the compulsory deliveries. Avaluació única: This evaluation will consist on the same activities described in the program. Requisits mínims per aprovar: To consider the subject passed, it will be necessary to obtain a minimum grade of 5.0
At the beginning of the course, all the necessary instructions for the follow-up of the subject will be given. In addition, he forum will be used to inform about important dates and events about the course.