Obtenir i elaborar una història clínica que contingui tota la informació rellevant Reconèixer i tractar les situacions que posen la vida en perill immediat i aquelles altres que exigeixen atenció immediata Escoltar amb atenció, obtenir i sintetitzar informació pertinent dels problemes que afecten el malalt i comprendre el contingut d'aquesta informació Comunicar-se de manera efectiva i clara, tant oralment com per escrit, amb els pacients, els familiars, els mitjans de comunicació i altres professionals Garantir el coneixement adequat de la llengua anglesa, tant oral com escrita, tenint en compte les especificitats del registre mèdic per a poder comunicar-se eficaçment a la comunitat internacional científica i professional
1. Chest pain: epidemiology in the emergency department and clinical manifestations such as localization, quality and severity, provocation and relief, and other associated signs and symptoms according to their origin. 2. Abdominal pain: epidemiology in the emergency department and clinical manifestations such as localization, quality and severity, provocation and relief, and other associated signs and symptoms according to their origin. 3. Mechanisms by which chest pain and abdominal pain occur. 4. Models of care of emergency departments and their relationship with the healthcare services in the community. 5. Critical analysis of research and clinical evidence, and their relationships with the principles of sustainable medicine. 6. Communication with patients and families medical regarding information in an emergency room environment. 7. Medical terms in English related to emergency medicine
Tipus d’activitat Hores amb professor Hores sense professor Total Aprenentatge basat en problemes (PBL) 24,00 93,00 117,00 Seminaris 2,00 2,00 4,00 Sessió expositiva 2,00 2,00 4,00 Total 28,00 97,00 125
Glenn C Hamilton (2003). Emergency Medicine: an approach to clinical problem-solving. Saunders. Catàleg O John Ma; David Cline (2004). Emergency Medicine Manual. New York: McGraw-Hill, Medical Pub. Division. Catàleg Wald DA (2008). Emergency Medicine Clerkship Primer. A Manual for Medical Students. Clerkship Directors in Emergency Medicine. Recuperat , a http://www.saem.org/saemdnn/Academies/CDEM/ResourcesforMedicalStudents/tabid/885 Wardrope J, Mackenzie R. (2004). The ABC of community emergency care: 2. The system of assessment and care of the. Emerg Med J, 21(), 216-225 Laird C, Driscoll P, Wardrope J (2004). The ABC of community emergency care: 3. Chest pain. Emerg Med J, 21(), 226-232 Gray J, Wardrope J, Fothergill DJ (2004). The ABC of community emergency care: 7. Abdominal pain, abdominal pain in women,. Emerg Med J, 21(), 606-613 Redfern E, Brown R, Vincent CA. (2009). Improving communication in the emergency department. Emerg Med J, 26(), 658-661 Millar M (2010). Can antibiotic use be both just and sustainable… or only more or less so? . J Med Ethics,, Asplin BR, Magid DJ, Rhodes KV, Solberg LI, Lurie N, Camargo CA (2003). A conceptual model of Emergency Department Crowding. Ann Emerg Med , 42(), 173-180 Catàleg
Activitats d'avaluació: Descripció de l'activitat Avaluació de l'activitat % PBL sessions evaluation - Responsability - Learning abilities - Communication - Interpersonal relationships 50 PBL exam First part: relevance to the learning objectives, relevance to the problem or situation and justification of the 4 chosen topics. Second part: accreditation of knowledge acquired by means of the 2 questions related to the 2 selected topics. Readability and conciseness of both parts. 50
- PBL sessions evaluation will account for 50% of the module evaluation. Criteria (Grade proportion) Responsibility (25%) Learning abilities (25%) Communication (25%) Interpersonal relationships (25%) - The PBL exam is going to account for the other 50%. 1st Part Criteria for each of the 4 topics (Grade proportion) Relevance to the learning objectives (2%) Relevance to the situation (2%) Justification (6%) 2nd Part Criterion for each of the 2 questions (Grade proportion) Accreditation of knowledge acquired within the question context (25%) Both parts Criterion (Grade proportion) Readability and conciseness (10%) Criteris específics de la nota «No Presentat»:Not attending at the PBL sessions.